Phase 1 of A.6.3i: populate the field chain in tinfofornode's TSTRUCT
and TTUPLE arms so Phase 2/J/K (#58/#59/#60) can retire dotfieldtnode,
dotinnerstructptr, dotchainresolve, and indexbaseesz off their AST-keyed
structinfo walk and onto a tinfo read. Direct analog 26724fe (#50 phase
1, A.6.3f-a) for the head/tail append-list pattern.
TSTRUCT walks n.list's N_TFIELD chain in lockstep with the existing
natural-layout offset accumulator: alloc tfield {name, type_, offset,
tnext}, link head/tail, set r.fields after the loop. Mirrors cstage
cmd/wcc/check.c:468-527. Harec cite: ref/harec/include/types.h:109-115
struct_field and ref/harec/src/type_store.c:314-347 struct_init_from_atype.
Anonymous-embed promotion not populated here (#13 per the cstage cite
at check.ww:1263).
TTUPLE adds a new ttupleelem struct {type_, offset, tnext} on a new
tinfo.tupleelems slot, distinct from .fields per Rob's call: harec
splits struct_field vs type_tuple at types.h:109-115 vs :122-126
because tuples are positional/anonymous and struct members are named,
and the name="" idiom #50 reused for tagged-variants-on-tparam would
conflate two semantic axes. Diverges from cstage cmd/wcc/check.c:329-345
which stores tuple positionals on t->params (Tparam, no offset, consumer
recomputes by walking at cgen.c:5723-5750); storing the offset matches
the A.6 stamp-once-read-many arc Phase 2/J/K consume. Offset is raw-sum
(no per-element padding) matching cstage cgen.c:5723-5750, distinct
from harec's add_padding at type_store.c:561.
Purely additive: r.fields and r.tupleelems have zero readers today.
Phase 2/J/K consume. make test 133/133 (worker port); test-unit 124/124
post comment-only review trim.
Hojun-Cho
6c9a3b369e