Reject helpers checked only rc!=0, so a SEGFAULT (exit 139, or the
driver's "w6c failed" exit 1) counted as a clean reject -- a wwstage
crash could pass vacuously (it did, latently, on bodied bare-... pre
#11). Every reject row now captures stderr and requires the actual
diagnostic substring (rc!=0 AND strstr) across all 16 reject tests; a
crash emits no diagnostic, so it now fails. This is the
differential-reject backstop (#15): both stages must cleanly reject
with the expected message.
Two genuine cstage/wwstage diagnostic-body divergences are documented
inline via per-stage substrings, not papered over (845 tuple parse,
catA_f2 tuple arity); catalogued in #21.
def S:str = "hi"; S[0] silently segfaulted: a def is a compile-time
constant, never materialized as DATA (unlike let), so indexing it emitted
an unbacked main.S(SB) reference -> cstage ran into frame garbage,
wwstage link-failed. str[i] itself is valid ww (a deliberate Go-like
str[i]->u8 byte-index that lib/strings compare/dup depend on), so the fix
is narrow: the N_INDEX TY_STR arm now rejects an index whose operand is a
bare SK_DEF scalar-str symbol, both stages -- 'cannot index a def-constant
str; bind it to a let'. INDEX-ONLY: len(S) and &S are already loud, and a
def's .len/.ptr field reads (the load-bearing w6l INTERP) are N_DOT, a
different arm, and stay valid.
A rule-9 WHY-comment records str[i]->u8 as a sanctioned divergence from
Hare's strings.toutf8. The full make-it-work fold (len(S)->2, S[0]->byte)
is deferred (#16). byte-id 990-997 8/8. test/wcc/821 table-driven.
