Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ce3a25a0b4 test: contain sepwork scratch per-driver tmpdir, fix /tmp+in-repo leak (#8)
The wcc test drivers ran `ww build <bare-/tmp src>` with no -o, so the
compiler's <stem>.sepwork scratch landed beside the source and was never
cleaned: unbounded /tmp growth (2195 stale dirs observed) that fills tmpfs
and fabricates phantom test failures + silent harness aborts, and for
in-repo fixture builds leaked .sepwork into the tracked tree.

Each leaking build now writes its source + output inside a per-invocation
tmpdir, passes -o <tmpdir>/<stem> so the .sepwork lands inside it, and
rm -rf's the tmpdir on every exit path -- including fopen-fail and the
expected-fail reject builds (scratch is mkdir'd before the build can fail).
`ww run` and explicit-`-o`/byte-id helpers are left as-is; the 990/993
byte-id comparison logic is byte-for-byte unchanged.

Two items filed separately (this commit holds the no-Makefile / no-main.c
rail):
- #13: a stale <src>.s byte-id readback (749) silently no-ops since
  separate-compile emits .s to <ostem>.sepwork/__root.s; documented inline.
- #14: build-system Makefile recipes build selfhost/cmd/*/main.ww with no
  -o and leak main.sepwork in-tree (bounded, gitignored; own commit).

One concern -- sepwork leak hygiene -- across 228 drivers; uniform
transform applied per-file and two-round reviewed. make test: all 402
passed, zero net-new /tmp scratch, zero test-driven in-repo .sepwork.
2026-06-22 23:29:39 +09:00
d960971c6e wcc: continue runs post-step in 3-clause for and range form (#138)
`for (init; cond; post) { ... continue; ... }` and `for (let i .. xs)
{ ... continue; ... }` now emit a `post` (3-clause) or `rpost` (range)
label between the body and the JMP back to the cond-test. `continue`
jumps to that label, runs the post-step, then re-tests the loop
condition — mirrors C/Go/Hare semantics. Pre-fix both stages emitted
`JMP loop_top` for continue, SKIPPING the post-step → the value that
triggered continue never advanced → silent infinite loop on the first
matching iteration. Found by impl-strconv-fold2 during the fold-3
decimal.ha port: `leftshift_newdigits`'s `for (... i+=1) { ... else
if (d.digits[i]==p5[i]) continue; ... }` would infinite-loop at the
first equal digit.

BOTH stages were identically buggy → 990-997 cs==ww byte-id held →
gate-blind. Bootstrap audit (`grep -rE 'for \(let .*\.\.' lib/
selfhost/`) confirmed zero existing callers with continue in either
the 3-clause or range form; bootstrap-NEUTRAL.

Sites: cmd/w6c/cgen.c N_FOR + N_FORRANGE; selfhost/cmd/wcc/
cgenstmt.ww cgfor + cgforrange. 1-clause `for (cond)` byte-id
preserved (cont_target stays = loop_top when n.rhs == nil). Rule-11
carve-out: 3-clause and range share the lowered structure; fixing
one without the other would leave the same silent miscompile in
N_FORRANGE — one-class closure on the continue-skips-post bug, same
precedent as #133-expanded.

911_continue_run: 4 rows. for3_skip_one (lead's repro, was infinite
loop, now 4), for3_skip_two (nested continues, 30), range_skip
(Hare-range continue, was infinite loop, now 120), for1_continue_
byteid (1-clause regression assertion — bootstrap shape unchanged).
Pre-existing parser-side divergences (cstage silently drops post in
the never-used 2-clause `for (cond; post)`; wwstage doesn't support
infinite `for {}`) deferred to #139 — not in decimal.ha, no shared
class with the cgen continue-skips-post.
2026-05-27 00:12:39 +09:00